Arbitration vs. Litigation: What Chiropractors and Patients Should Know

If a dispute arises, would arbitration or going to court be better for you and your chiropractic practice?

In chiropractic care, disputes can be resolved through arbitration or traditional litigation.

Arbitration involves a neutral third party (an arbitrator) who reviews the case and makes a binding decision.

It is usually faster, more private, and less costly than going to court.

Litigation, on the other hand, takes place in a public courtroom with a judge or jury.

It is often longer, more expensive, and stressful for both patients and practitioners.

For chiropractors, arbitration agreements can reduce legal risk and maintain professional relationships.

For patients, arbitration can offer a clear, efficient way to resolve disputes.

The National Chiropractic Council (NCC) has been securing reliable and affordable malpractice insurance for chiropractors just like you since 1986.

Protect your practice and reassure your patients with NCC, starting now!